000			01553nam a22001937a 4500
003			OSt
005			20220821124449.0
008			220821b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020			_a9780521176590 (pbk)
040			_cLibrary of People’s Majlis
041			_aeng
082			_a342.410
245			_aJudicial reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act / _cedited by Helen Fenwick, Gavin Phillipson, Roger Masterman.
260			_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2007.
300			_axxvii, 455 pages : _c23 cm.
500			_aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
520			_aJudicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act is a collection of essays written by leading experts in the field, which examines judicial decision-making under the UK's de facto Bill of Rights. The book focuses both on changes in areas of substantive law and the techniques of judicial reasoning adopted to implement the Act. The contributors therefore consider first general Convention and Human Rights Act concepts – statutory interpretation, horizontal effect, judicial review, deference, the reception of Strasbourg case-law – since they arise across all areas of substantive law. They then proceed to examine not only the use of such concepts in particular fields of law (privacy, family law, clashing rights, discrimination and criminal procedure), but also the modes of reasoning by which judges seek to bridge the divide between familiar common law and statutory doctrines and those in the Convention.
942			_2ddc _cBK
999			_c5605 _d5605